on demand observed floor
Civo · $1.29/GPU hr
240 GPU-hours: $309.60
- Region sample
- Unspecified
- Observed
- Valid through
Published official-source price snapshot
Compare L40S GPU prices from 6 providers. Observed range: $1.29–$1.80 per GPU-hour, with source evidence, availability signals, and cost estimates.
L40S price snapshot:Checking the declared provider-SLA boundary.Valid through ; historical after that instant.
Provider-specific evidence boundary
No. This page does not include a current Runpod L40S rate. SaaS Sentinel's source-use registry currently blocks automated collection under the recorded provider terms and limits factual comparison to retained historical evidence.
Old Runpod values are therefore excluded from every range, calculation, shortlist and recommendation on this page. Use the provider's official pricing page as the purchase authority and request a scoped quote for the exact configuration and region you need.
Source-use review recorded 2026-08-22; no provider price or capacity claim is inferred from search demand.
Citation-ready model evidence
Copy the reconciled model statement with its attribution, exact validity deadline, scope, limitations, canonical URL, and machine-readable evidence endpoint.
For L40S, the public-evidence snapshot observed published cloud prices from $1.2900 to $1.8000 per GPU-hour across 6 providers; the latest included observation was 2026-09-09T22:35:30Z.
Valid through ; after that instant, describe the figures as a historical snapshot and verify the linked provider evidence.
Currency calculation evidence
Every converted figure retains its native EUR amount and the exact official reference observation used.
Each card shows the lowest observed representative rate within its own purchase model. Spot and on-demand are intentionally not placed in one cheapest-to-expensive ranking because interruption risk, capacity behavior, and commercial terms are not interchangeable.
These are price floors, not recommendations: availability, region coverage, support, commitments, and workload fit can change the better purchasing choice.
on demand observed floor
240 GPU-hours: $309.60
Purchase models are kept separate because interruption risk, commitment terms, and capacity behavior are not interchangeable. Each range uses only representative offers that were inside SLA when the snapshot was generated.
| Purchase model | Representative offers | Observed hourly range | 730 GPU hr range |
|---|---|---|---|
| on demand | 6 | $1.29/GPU hr–$1.80/GPU hr | $941.70–$1,314.00 |
Across the representative offers in this snapshot, the normalized rate runs from $1.29 to $1.80 per GPU-hour, a gap of $0.51. At 730 GPU-hours, that rate gap corresponds to $372.30.
160 GPU-hours
Observed compute budget range: $206.40–$288.00 at this usage level.
If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 223.3 GPU-hours — 63.3 more than this scenario.
Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.
240 GPU-hours
Observed compute budget range: $309.60–$432.00 at this usage level.
If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 334.9 GPU-hours — 94.9 more than this scenario.
Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.
730 GPU-hours
Observed compute budget range: $941.70–$1,314.00 at this usage level.
If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 1018.6 GPU-hours — 288.6 more than this scenario.
Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.
Read from the budget floor, the highest observed representative rate is 39.5% above the lowest; read from the ceiling, the lowest is 28.3% below the highest. This is price dispersion, not a guaranteed saving: purchase model, availability, region coverage, support, commitments, and workload fit can differ between offers.
Representative comparable offers were normalized to a per-GPU-hour rate and ranked from lowest to highest when this snapshot was generated.
| Provider | Variant | Market | Price | 730 GPU hr | Freshness | Observed | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civo | L40S | on demand | $1.29/GPU hr | $941.70 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19Z | Source | |
| Crusoe Cloud | L40S | on demand | $1.50/GPU hr | $1,095.00 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19Z | Source | |
| DigitalOcean | L40S | on demand | $1.57/GPU hr | $1,146.10 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19Z | Source | |
| Vultr | L40S | on demand | $1.67/GPU hr | $1,219.10 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:19Z | Source | |
| Scaleway | 48GB | on demand | $1.71/GPU hrIndicative SaaS Sentinel calculation. Native price €1.4699/node-hour ( €1.4699/GPU-hour). USD uses 1.1652 USD/EUR from the ECB reference dated 2026-09-09. ECB reference rate ↗. ECB reference data are available free from the ECB. Not an invoice or transaction rate. | $1,250.27 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:30Z | Source | |
| OVHcloud | 48GB | on demand | $1.80/GPU hr | $1,314.00 | recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:28Z | Source |
These are explicitly named regions reported by offers that were comparable and inside SLA when the snapshot was generated. Counts and provider identities describe observed catalog coverage, not live capacity or guaranteed availability; unspecified placements are not assigned to a region.
Regional provider concentration
0 observed regions included comparable L40S catalog evidence inside SLA from at least two providers at publication, while 4 were represented by one provider only.
Cross-provider catalog coverage: 0% of explicitly named regions.
3+ provider catalog depth: 0 named regions (0%) include a third observed provider option. This is a deeper catalog-diversity signal only, not proof that those providers are operationally substitutable or simultaneously available.
Decision read: Every explicitly named region in this published comparable snapshot is represented by one provider only, so regional fallback planning has no cross-provider catalog evidence here.
Single-provider region watchlist: fr-par-2 — Scaleway, pl-waw-2 — Scaleway, us-east-va-1 — OVHcloud, plus 1 more in the region table below. Each provider shown is only the sole provider represented by comparable catalog rows for that named region in this published snapshot; it is not a live availability or exclusivity claim.
This is a catalog-breadth signal for fallback planning, not proof of simultaneous capacity, failover readiness, quota, latency, workload fit, or contractual substitutability.
| Region | Offers inside SLA at publication | Providers represented | Observed providers |
|---|---|---|---|
| fr-par-2 | 4 | 1 | Scaleway |
| pl-waw-2 | 4 | 1 | Scaleway |
| us-east-va-1 | 3 | 1 | OVHcloud |
| us-west-or-1 | 3 | 1 | OVHcloud |
2 of 6 representative offers (33%) have a non-unknown deployment status backed by a separate HTTPS evidence source and a valid observation time.
Deployability evidence gap
4 representative offers lacked qualifying deployment-eligibility evidence in this published snapshot and remain explicitly unevidenced here.
Decision read: 4 representative offers in this published snapshot should still be treated as unknown for deployability comparisons; do not use a price row as a substitute for capacity evidence.
Deployment eligibility is separate from price freshness. It does not prove live stock or allocatable capacity; offers without qualifying evidence remain explicitly unknown.
Availability is tracked separately from pricing. The evidence kind distinguishes deployment eligibility from live stock or allocatable capacity; none of those claims is inferred from a listed price.
| Provider | Market | Regions | Status | Evidence kind | Observed | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Civo | on demand | Unspecified | unknown | unknown | Not separately observed | No separate source |
| Crusoe Cloud | on demand | Unspecified | unknown | unknown | Not separately observed | No separate source |
| DigitalOcean | on demand | Unspecified | unknown | unknown | Not separately observed | No separate source |
| Vultr | on demand | Unspecified | unknown | unknown | Not separately observed | No separate source |
| Scaleway | on demand | pl-waw-2 | available | stock status | Availability source | |
| OVHcloud | on demand | us-east-va-1 | available | deployment eligibility | Availability source |
Enter the GPU-hours you expect to consume. The estimate uses the same lowest and highest representative hourly rates shown above and excludes storage, bandwidth, support, taxes, commitments, and negotiated discounts.
These estimates multiply GPU-hours by the lowest and highest representative hourly rates above. They exclude storage, bandwidth, support, taxes, commitments, and negotiated discounts.
| GPU-hours | Published price range |
|---|---|
| 40 | $51.60–$72.00 |
| 160 | $206.40–$288.00 |
| 240 | $309.60–$432.00 |
| 730 | $941.70–$1,314.00 |
Open the exact provider × L40S decision sheets that passed the autonomous publication gates for this snapshot. Each page keeps provider-specific regions, configurations, evidence, and normalized rates separate from the broader market view above.
Independent human review
If your choice also depends on workload fit, capacity, contracts, support or migration risk, send us the shortlist and constraints. The fixed-scope review returns a source-linked decision memo and does not accept provider commissions.
Review the broader GPU cloud pricing hub, the data sources, the editorial policy, and the corrections policy to inspect how SaaS Sentinel sources, reviews, and corrects published evidence.