Published official-source price snapshot

L40S cloud price per hour and cost calculator

Compare L40S GPU prices from 6 providers. Observed range: $1.29–$1.80 per GPU-hour, with source evidence, availability signals, and cost estimates.

L40S price snapshot:Checking the declared provider-SLA boundary.Valid through ; historical after that instant.

Provider-specific evidence boundary

Is a current Runpod L40S price included?

No. This page does not include a current Runpod L40S rate. SaaS Sentinel's source-use registry currently blocks automated collection under the recorded provider terms and limits factual comparison to retained historical evidence.

Old Runpod values are therefore excluded from every range, calculation, shortlist and recommendation on this page. Use the provider's official pricing page as the purchase authority and request a scoped quote for the exact configuration and region you need.

Source-use review recorded 2026-08-22; no provider price or capacity claim is inferred from search demand.

Citation-ready model evidence

Reuse this L40S snapshot without losing its boundaries

Copy the reconciled model statement with its attribution, exact validity deadline, scope, limitations, canonical URL, and machine-readable evidence endpoint.

For L40S, the public-evidence snapshot observed published cloud prices from $1.2900 to $1.8000 per GPU-hour across 6 providers; the latest included observation was 2026-09-09T22:35:30Z.

Valid through ; after that instant, describe the figures as a historical snapshot and verify the linked provider evidence.

  • Scope: Comparable published rates for the exact L40S model; spot and on-demand evidence remain distinct on the canonical page.
  • Limitation: The observed minimum is a price floor, not a provider recommendation.
  • Limitation: Availability evidence is tracked independently and is not inferred from the rate.
  • Limitation: Verify the provider source after valid_through and before committing spend.

Currency calculation evidence

Scaleway USD figures are calculated, not provider-published USD

Every converted figure retains its native EUR amount and the exact official reference observation used.

Indicative SaaS Sentinel calculation. Native price €1.4699/node-hour ( €1.4699/GPU-hour). USD uses 1.1652 USD/EUR from the ECB reference dated 2026-09-09. ECB reference rate ↗. ECB reference data are available free from the ECB. Not an invoice or transaction rate.

Decision snapshot by purchase model

Each card shows the lowest observed representative rate within its own purchase model. Spot and on-demand are intentionally not placed in one cheapest-to-expensive ranking because interruption risk, capacity behavior, and commercial terms are not interchangeable.

These are price floors, not recommendations: availability, region coverage, support, commitments, and workload fit can change the better purchasing choice.

on demand observed floor

Civo · $1.29/GPU hr

240 GPU-hours: $309.60

Region sample
Unspecified
Observed
Valid through
Inspect official source ↗

L40S price by purchase model

Purchase models are kept separate because interruption risk, commitment terms, and capacity behavior are not interchangeable. Each range uses only representative offers that were inside SLA when the snapshot was generated.

Purchase modelRepresentative offersObserved hourly range730 GPU hr range
on demand6$1.29/GPU hr–$1.80/GPU hr$941.70–$1,314.00

Observed L40S price dispersion

Across the representative offers in this snapshot, the normalized rate runs from $1.29 to $1.80 per GPU-hour, a gap of $0.51. At 730 GPU-hours, that rate gap corresponds to $372.30.

160 GPU-hours

$81.60 price-range gap

Observed compute budget range: $206.40–$288.00 at this usage level.

If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 223.3 GPU-hours — 63.3 more than this scenario.

Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.

240 GPU-hours

$122.40 price-range gap

Observed compute budget range: $309.60–$432.00 at this usage level.

If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 334.9 GPU-hours — 94.9 more than this scenario.

Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.

730 GPU-hours

$372.30 price-range gap

Observed compute budget range: $941.70–$1,314.00 at this usage level.

If the observed floor rate were otherwise suitable for the same workload, that ceiling budget would mathematically cover 1018.6 GPU-hours — 288.6 more than this scenario.

Difference between the lowest and highest representative L40S rates at this usage level.

Read from the budget floor, the highest observed representative rate is 39.5% above the lowest; read from the ceiling, the lowest is 28.3% below the highest. This is price dispersion, not a guaranteed saving: purchase model, availability, region coverage, support, commitments, and workload fit can differ between offers.

Published L40S cloud pricing evidence

Representative comparable offers were normalized to a per-GPU-hour rate and ranked from lowest to highest when this snapshot was generated.

ProviderVariantMarketPrice730 GPU hrFreshnessObservedEvidence
CivoL40Son demand$1.29/GPU hr$941.70recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19ZSource
Crusoe CloudL40Son demand$1.50/GPU hr$1,095.00recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19ZSource
DigitalOceanL40Son demand$1.57/GPU hr$1,146.10recentValid through 2026-09-10T22:35:19ZSource
VultrL40Son demand$1.67/GPU hr$1,219.10recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:19ZSource
Scaleway48GBon demand$1.71/GPU hrIndicative SaaS Sentinel calculation. Native price €1.4699/node-hour ( €1.4699/GPU-hour). USD uses 1.1652 USD/EUR from the ECB reference dated 2026-09-09. ECB reference rate ↗. ECB reference data are available free from the ECB. Not an invoice or transaction rate.$1,250.27recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:30ZSource
OVHcloud48GBon demand$1.80/GPU hr$1,314.00recentValid through 2026-09-10T04:35:28ZSource

L40S regional coverage

These are explicitly named regions reported by offers that were comparable and inside SLA when the snapshot was generated. Counts and provider identities describe observed catalog coverage, not live capacity or guaranteed availability; unspecified placements are not assigned to a region.

Regional provider concentration

0 of 4 named regions have evidence from 2+ providers

0 observed regions included comparable L40S catalog evidence inside SLA from at least two providers at publication, while 4 were represented by one provider only.

Cross-provider catalog coverage: 0% of explicitly named regions.

3+ provider catalog depth: 0 named regions (0%) include a third observed provider option. This is a deeper catalog-diversity signal only, not proof that those providers are operationally substitutable or simultaneously available.

Decision read: Every explicitly named region in this published comparable snapshot is represented by one provider only, so regional fallback planning has no cross-provider catalog evidence here.

Single-provider region watchlist: fr-par-2 — Scaleway, pl-waw-2 — Scaleway, us-east-va-1 — OVHcloud, plus 1 more in the region table below. Each provider shown is only the sole provider represented by comparable catalog rows for that named region in this published snapshot; it is not a live availability or exclusivity claim.

This is a catalog-breadth signal for fallback planning, not proof of simultaneous capacity, failover readiness, quota, latency, workload fit, or contractual substitutability.

RegionOffers inside SLA at publicationProviders representedObserved providers
fr-par-241Scaleway
pl-waw-241Scaleway
us-east-va-131OVHcloud
us-west-or-131OVHcloud
Check availability evidence

Deployability evidence coverage

2 of 6 representative offers (33%) have a non-unknown deployment status backed by a separate HTTPS evidence source and a valid observation time.

Deployability evidence gap

33% separately evidenced

33%

4 representative offers lacked qualifying deployment-eligibility evidence in this published snapshot and remain explicitly unevidenced here.

Decision read: 4 representative offers in this published snapshot should still be treated as unknown for deployability comparisons; do not use a price row as a substitute for capacity evidence.

Deployment eligibility is separate from price freshness. It does not prove live stock or allocatable capacity; offers without qualifying evidence remain explicitly unknown.

Typed availability evidence

Availability is tracked separately from pricing. The evidence kind distinguishes deployment eligibility from live stock or allocatable capacity; none of those claims is inferred from a listed price.

ProviderMarketRegionsStatusEvidence kindObservedEvidence
Civoon demandUnspecifiedunknownunknownNot separately observedNo separate source
Crusoe Cloudon demandUnspecifiedunknownunknownNot separately observedNo separate source
DigitalOceanon demandUnspecifiedunknownunknownNot separately observedNo separate source
Vultron demandUnspecifiedunknownunknownNot separately observedNo separate source
Scalewayon demandpl-waw-2availablestock statusAvailability source
OVHcloudon demandus-east-va-1availabledeployment eligibilityAvailability source

Calculate L40S GPU cost

Enter the GPU-hours you expect to consume. The estimate uses the same lowest and highest representative hourly rates shown above and excludes storage, bandwidth, support, taxes, commitments, and negotiated discounts.

At 240 GPU-hours: $309.60–$432.00; observed range gap: $122.40.

L40S cost scenarios

These estimates multiply GPU-hours by the lowest and highest representative hourly rates above. They exclude storage, bandwidth, support, taxes, commitments, and negotiated discounts.

GPU-hoursPublished price range
40$51.60–$72.00
160$206.40–$288.00
240$309.60–$432.00
730$941.70–$1,314.00

Compare L40S by provider

Open the exact provider × L40S decision sheets that passed the autonomous publication gates for this snapshot. Each page keeps provider-specific regions, configurations, evidence, and normalized rates separate from the broader market view above.

Independent human review

Turn this L40S price evidence into a procurement decision

If your choice also depends on workload fit, capacity, contracts, support or migration risk, send us the shortlist and constraints. The fixed-scope review returns a source-linked decision memo and does not accept provider commissions.

Review my GPU decisionRead an illustrative memo

How this comparison is built

  • Only comparable normalized records for the exact L40S model are eligible.
  • Good-freshness records are limited to the existing live, recent, or verified states; 100% of comparable rows met that publication status when this snapshot was generated.
  • Representative rows keep the lowest normalized rate for each provider and market type, so spot and on-demand offers are not blended together.
  • Pricing evidence does not guarantee live capacity. Check the linked source and provider availability before purchasing.

Verification and policies

Review the broader GPU cloud pricing hub, the data sources, the editorial policy, and the corrections policy to inspect how SaaS Sentinel sources, reviews, and corrects published evidence.