Founding pilot · independent decision assurance

Challenge the GPU decision before the contract makes it expensive

Send your workload constraints, shortlist or up to three redacted provider quotes. We challenge technical fit, capacity evidence, real cost and commercial gaps, then return a decision memo your team can defend.

Your first substantive response comes from a person: we confirm fit or ask for missing non-sensitive facts, explain capacity and the next step, and never accept or bill an engagement automatically.

  • No account, calculator or dossier required
  • One decision and up to three candidate providers
  • Buyer-funded: provider payments cannot change the ranking

Commercial boundary

Buyer-funded review, never a paid ranking

The fee pays for evidence review and decision challenge. It cannot improve a provider's position. Any future referral or introduction is disclosed separately and requires a new, provider-specific consent.

Named and contactable

A founder-run review with an inspectable method

SaaS Sentinel is independently built and the founding reviews are handled by Enrique Luis Lloret Calbo. This is a bounded pilot, not an anonymous lead marketplace or an automated provider recommendation presented as consultancy.

Contact

enriqueluislloret@gmail.com

You can complete the entire review by email. No account, sales call, meeting or spoken English is required.

What the pilot covers

A decision package that engineering, finance and procurement can challenge together

One review covers a single decision, one redacted workload scenario and up to three candidate providers or quotes.

01 · Evidence audit

Source and freshness register

Prices, capacity evidence, timestamps, unknowns and evidence that must be revalidated before commitment.

02 · Decision challenge

Cost, fit and downside cases

Whole-node compute boundary, missing TCO items, excluded alternatives and failure conditions that could reverse the recommendation.

03 · Procurement pack

Questions and sign-off memo

A concise provider question list, risk register and decision memo suitable for internal review.

04 · Written follow-up

One asynchronous clarification round

Send one consolidated set of questions after delivery and receive the answers in writing. No meeting is required.

See an illustrative version of the memo

Acceptance process

No surprise invoice and no opaque hand-off

  1. Email the decision. A short problem statement, shortlist or redacted quotes are enough to start. We normalize the non-sensitive details internally; you do not have to operate any tool.
  2. We confirm fit in writing. Scope, exclusions, delivery date and payment method are agreed by email.
  3. Share evidence deliberately. Sensitive files move only through the handling route agreed in writing.
  4. Receive and clarify asynchronously. The memo and one consolidated clarification round are delivered in writing; no call is required.
  5. Start only after acceptance. An enquiry is not a purchase or contract.

Optional private request builder

Email us directly, or prepare a structured brief

You do not need to use a tool or book a call. Send a normal email, or use this local form when you want a consistent brief that your team can inspect before it leaves the browser.

Do include: decision stage, broad deadline, goals, public evidence gaps and a redacted dossier fingerprint.

Do not include: credentials, private contract text, customer names, proprietary dataset contents or unreleased architecture.

Required: your role, decision stage, deadline, a non-sensitive summary, one to three review goals, and the three confirmations below. Optional scope controls can stay at their defaults.

Review scope and emphasisDefaults cover the fixed pilot; change them only when needed
Review goals Choose one to three

The defaults cover the core review. Goals change emphasis, never the underlying provider ranking.

Add a Decision Room dossierOptional · the original file never leaves your browser automatically
Optional Decision Room dossier

Import happens locally. Only a redacted fingerprint, catalog date, candidate labels and uncertainty count can be included.

Nothing has been sent.

Explicit exclusions

What €750 does not quietly expand into

Not legal or security certification

The review flags evidence gaps; it does not replace counsel, a DPA review, penetration testing or a formal compliance audit.

Not implementation

Provisioning, migration, deployment, model optimization and ongoing cloud operations are outside this pilot.

Not guaranteed capacity

Published availability is evidence, not a reservation. The buyer must confirm quota and allocatable capacity with the provider.

Not provider representation

SaaS Sentinel does not negotiate or sign on behalf of either party in this pilot.

Email fallback

Your mail application did not open?

Download or copy the brief above and send it to enriqueluislloret@gmail.com. Do not attach an unredacted dossier unless its contents have been reviewed and intentionally approved for email.