Provider portfolio comparison

Hyperstack vs Microsoft Azure GPU pricing

Compare Hyperstack vs Microsoft Azure GPU prices: 302 official-source rates across 38 regions, $0.679–$23.326/GPU-hour. Estimate monthly cost.

Decision readout

What the current evidence says

Lowest observed rate

Microsoft Azure provides the lowest row in this exact evidence set at $0.6788 per GPU-hour. That is a list-price observation, not proof that capacity is rentable now.

Price dispersion

The highest row is 3336.5% above the lowest. At 160 GPU-hours, selecting opposite ends of the observed range changes the compute line item by $3623.56.

Capacity boundary

0 of 302 rates carry separate deployment-eligibility evidence. That signal is not live stock; unknown stays unknown and never inherits confidence from a fresh price.

This portfolio comparison covers the 2 GPU models shared by both providers: A100, H100. It is useful for teams selecting a cloud relationship across more than one workload. A provider can lead on one accelerator and trail on another, so the evidence table keeps each configuration visible.

Side-specific evidence profile

What each provider contributes to this comparison

The profile below prevents a large catalog from silently overwhelming a smaller one. Counts, regions, access models and observed price bands are stated independently for every provider.

Official configuration set

Microsoft Azure

$0.6788 lowest GPU-hour

Microsoft Azure contributes 300 qualifying configurations and 300 distinct source records. Microsoft Azure's observed price band runs from $0.6788 to $23.3260 per GPU-hour, equivalent to $108.60–$3732.16 for 160 GPU-hours.

Microsoft Azure covers 38 named regions: australiaeast, brazilsouth, canadacentral, canadaeast, centralindia, centralus, eastus, eastus2 and 30 more. The included node configurations range from 1 to 8 GPUs, with 153 on-demand and 147 spot records.

Microsoft Azure has independent deployment-eligibility evidence for 0 of 300 rows. This does not assert live stock. Its latest included price observation is 2026-08-13. GPU models in this exact comparison are A100, H100.

Configurations
300
Distinct source keys
300
Named regions
38
Deployability evidenced
0/300

Official configuration set

Hyperstack

$1.4800 lowest GPU-hour

Hyperstack contributes 2 qualifying configurations and 2 distinct source records. Hyperstack's observed price band runs from $1.4800 to $2.8500 per GPU-hour, equivalent to $236.80–$456.00 for 160 GPU-hours.

Hyperstack covers 0 named regions: . The included node configurations range from 1 to 1 GPUs, with 2 on-demand and 0 spot records.

Hyperstack has independent deployment-eligibility evidence for 0 of 2 rows. This does not assert live stock. Its latest included price observation is 2026-08-13. GPU models in this exact comparison are A100, H100.

Configurations
2
Distinct source keys
2
Named regions
0
Deployability evidenced
0/2

Model-by-model portfolio check

Which provider has the lower observed floor for each shared GPU

Each row holds the accelerator and purchase model constant before comparing provider floors. Region, node configuration, contract terms and separately evidenced availability can still differ, so this is a shortlist signal rather than a capacity claim.

GPU modelMarketMicrosoft Azure floorHyperstack floorObserved floor gap
A100on demand$3.3996/GPU-hour$1.4800/GPU-hourHyperstack lower$1.9196/GPU-hour · $307.14 at 160h
H100on demand$6.9800/GPU-hour$2.8500/GPU-hourHyperstack lower$4.1300/GPU-hour · $660.80 at 160h

Transparent scenario calculator

Convert hourly rates into your budget

The calculation multiplies GPU count by hours per GPU and the selected normalized rate. It excludes storage, egress, support, taxes, reservations and idle orchestration overhead.

At lowest observed rate$108.60
At highest observed rate$3732.16

Inspectable formula

scenario cost = GPUs × hours per GPU × normalized USD/GPU-hour

1 GPU × 160 hours × $0.6788–$23.3260 = $108.60–$3732.16

Configuration-level evidence

Rates included in this decision

Every row preserves the source configuration and observation date. Node rates are divided by GPU count to produce the normalized comparison. Equal normalized prices can still represent different regions, node sizes or access conditions.

Provider / configurationGPURegionMarketNode priceGPU-hour160h costAvailabilityEvidence
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/002P:eastus:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 1 GPU/nodeeastusspot$0.6788$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/002W:eastus2:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 1 GPU/nodeeastus2spot$0.6788$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/0002:eastus2:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 4 GPU/nodeeastus2spot$2.7151$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/000C:eastus:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 4 GPU/nodeeastusspot$2.7151$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/001R:eastus:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 2 GPU/nodeeastusspot$1.3575$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z09TGJ/002N:eastus2:spotA100PCIe 80GB · 2 GPU/nodeeastus2spot$1.3575$0.6788$108.60Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z0DS6T/0007:westus2:spotA100SXM 40GB · 8 GPU/nodewestus2spot$5.9833$0.7479$119.67Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Microsoft Azureazure:DZH318Z0DS6T/0008:eastus:spotA100SXM 40GB · 8 GPU/nodeeastusspot$5.9833$0.7479$119.67Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Hyperstackhyperstack:a100A100Variant not specified · 1 GPU/nodeGlobal / unspecifiedon demand$1.4800$1.4800$236.80Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13
Hyperstackhyperstack:h100H100Variant not specified · 1 GPU/nodeGlobal / unspecifiedon demand$2.8500$2.8500$456.00Not evidencedunknownOfficial source ↗Checked 2026-08-13

Showing up to eight lowest normalized rows per provider (10 of 302) so one large catalog cannot crowd out the other side. Open the global interactive database to filter the complete catalog.

Comparison discipline

What this page can and cannot decide

It can compare list-price evidence

All included rows use fresh or verified official sources, USD pricing and a common per-GPU-hour unit. The page is regenerated when source evidence changes.

It cannot promise capacity

A fresh price is not inventory. Availability is shown only when a separate exact-configuration source supports it, with its own observation clock and limitations.

It exposes the omitted costs

Networking, storage, support, taxes, commitments, setup work and interruption risk can change total cost. Confirm those terms before purchasing.

It retires weak URLs

This page exists only while automated evidence and uniqueness thresholds pass. One failed cycle removes it from the index; three consecutive failed cycles retire the route.

Adjacent decisions

Continue with the closest evidence sets

These links are selected by shared provider or GPU model, so the next page changes one decision variable instead of sending you to a generic article.

provider model comparison

Hyperstack vs Microsoft Azure · H100

184 official-source rates · 31 regions · $1.290–$23.326/GPU-hour.

Open comparison

provider model comparison

Hyperstack vs Microsoft Azure · A100

118 official-source rates · 22 regions · $0.679–$8.193/GPU-hour.

Open comparison

provider comparison

Microsoft Azure vs Paperspace comparison

304 official-source rates · 39 regions · $0.679–$23.326/GPU-hour.

Open comparison

provider comparison

Civo vs Microsoft Azure comparison

302 official-source rates · 38 regions · $0.679–$23.326/GPU-hour.

Open comparison

provider comparison

Crusoe Cloud vs Microsoft Azure comparison

302 official-source rates · 38 regions · $0.679–$23.326/GPU-hour.

Open comparison

provider comparison

Lambda vs Microsoft Azure comparison

302 official-source rates · 38 regions · $0.679–$23.326/GPU-hour.

Open comparison